đŸ‡șđŸ‡žđŸ’„ The Trump Tariff Saga: Big Threats, Small Inflation — So Far

Since April, the U.S. has been swept into another round of global trade turmoil, spearheaded by sweeping tariffs announced and threatened by the Trump administration. While fears of spiraling costs — nicknamed “tariff-flation” — dominated headlines, recent CPI (consumer price index) and PPI (producer price index) data suggest inflation has remained cooler than many predicted.

So, where are we in this saga? Let’s unpack.

🌎 The Big Bang: April Tariffs

On April 2, Trump announced tariffs ranging from 10% to 50% on imports from China, the EU, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and others. A blanket 10% tariff was slapped on most goods, with extra duties targeting key sectors like steel, aluminum, copper, autos, and jet parts. A 90-day delay window was built in, signaling room for deal-making.

Markets braced for impact, economists forecast price spikes, and global partners mobilized for retaliation.


đŸ‡ȘđŸ‡șđŸ‡§đŸ‡· Pushback and Retaliation

The European Union quickly threatened $23 billion in retaliatory tariffs, prompting Trump to temporarily lower his tariffs to 10% and open negotiations. Meanwhile, Brazil was hit hard last week: Trump will impose 50% tariffs on coffee, orange juice, beef, and aircraft, framing it as punishment for Brazil’s political moves against former president Jair Bolsonaro. Brazilian President Lula vowed countermeasures.

Canada and China were next in line, facing 35% tariffs starting August 1, with threats of up to 200% on copper and pharmaceuticals if no deal emerged. Letters to Mexico and the EU followed, announcing 30% tariffs effective August 1, citing trade deficits, cartel issues, and failed negotiations.


⚖ Legal Challenges and the “TACO” Trade

But it wasn’t all smooth sailing. U.S. courts ruled that some of the tariffs exceeded presidential trade powers, putting parts of Trump’s “Liberation Day” actions into legal limbo. The White House appealed.

Meanwhile, markets coined the term “TACO trade” — short for “Trump Always Chickens Out” — as deadlines slipped and threats piled up, but many tariffs never materialized. Only the UK and Vietnam managed to secure preliminary deals, while Canada, Japan, Korea, and others remained stuck.


📊 The Current Cost: U.S. Average Effective Tariff Rates

According to a recent Budget Lab analysis at Yale (July 14, 2025), the average effective U.S. tariff rate has reached levels not seen in decades. Prior to consumer and business adjustments (“pre‑substitution”), the average tariff rate now stands at 18.2%, marking a dramatic increase from baseline levels—a level not seen since the early 20th century.

Once substitution effects are accounted for (importers and buyers shifting to alternative sources), the effective rate moderates slightly to 17.3% — still profoundly higher than historical norms, with the last comparable figures in the 1930s.

Why does the distinction matter? The pre-substitution rate represents the raw burden on consumers and firms before they respond to higher prices. It captures the immediate inflationary pressure — approximately an 18.2 percentage-point tariff hike. Post-substitution reflects a more adaptive scenario: buyers replace costlier goods with alternatives, partially offsetting the tariff shock. Even then, at 17.3%, consumers face sharply higher costs across the board.

Importantly, Budget Lab highlights that some of these adjustments may occur relatively quickly — within days or weeks — but other shifts may take far longer. In practical terms, this suggests businesses and households are likely already feeling the cost pinch, even if headline inflation indicators (CPI, PPI) haven’t fully caught up yet.

This new data serves as a vivid reminder: while “tariff‑flation” hasn’t fully materialized in the inflation stats so far, the underlying cost structure has changed dramatically—and more price pressure could surface as substitution effects play out over time.


📈 Markets Shrug, Prices Stay Cool

Here’s the twist: despite the tariff chaos, Wall Street has largely shrugged. U.S. stock indexes not only recovered from the spring dip but hit new all-time highs by July. Investors seem to bet on Trump’s pattern of threats followed by delays, or soft landings through last-minute deals.

Even more surprising, the much-feared inflation shock has not arrived. June’s CPI data came in cooler than expected, and producer prices (PPI) similarly underwhelmed. While some import categories have seen cost increases, broad-based consumer inflation has not surged.

In fact, ZeroHedge notes that the “tariff-flation” narrative has been largely defanged, at least so far. Tariffs have not significantly spilled over into higher core consumer prices, likely thanks to a mix of delayed implementation, corporate absorption of costs, and strong dollar effects offsetting import pressures. Interestingly, the faster pace of increase in consumer prices means that producers‘ margins have stopped contracting and are now, in fact, expanding.


🧐 Why Has “Tariff-Flation” Not Happened (Yet)?

Several factors help explain why the dire predictions haven’t played out:

✅ Delayed and Partial Implementation: Many of the harshest tariffs were postponed or scaled down amid negotiations.

✅ Global Supply Adjustments: U.S. companies have shifted supply chains, sourcing from countries outside the tariff zones.

✅ Corporate Cost Absorption: Many firms have eaten part of the cost hikes to avoid passing them to consumers — at least temporarily.

✅ Currency Offsets: A strong U.S. dollar has made imports cheaper, softening tariff impacts.

However, it’s worth noting that producer margins are being squeezed, and some sectors — notably steel, aluminum, and agriculture — are feeling sharper pain.


⏰ August 1: A Critical Deadline

As we head toward August 1, tensions are peaking. Will the Trump administration lock in last-minute deals with the EU, Mexico, Canada, and China? Or will the threatened tariffs kick in, unleashing a new wave of retaliatory measures and potentially shaking global markets?

Germany, Ireland, and other EU nations are pressing hard for a framework resolution, and negotiations are intense behind the scenes. If they fail, the escalation could finally start feeding into prices in a more systemic way.


🔼 What’s Next?

The Trump tariff saga is a mix of political brinkmanship, legal battles, and global market dynamics. While the “art of the deal” approach has so far kept markets buoyant and inflation in check, the risks are far from over.

For businesses, the message is clear:

  • Prepare for supply chain disruptions.
  • Monitor sector-specific risks.
  • Watch the August 1 deadline closely.

And for policymakers and investors, the big question remains: can this policy of pressure, delay, and negotiation hold — or is the real economic fallout yet to come?


💡 TL;DR:

→ Big tariff threats since April → Repeated delays and partial deals → Wall Street rallies, core inflation stays cool → August 1 is the key moment — deals or escalation?

We’re living through one of the most chaotic and consequential trade experiments in recent memory. Whether it ends in a handshake đŸ€ or a punch đŸ„Š — only time will tell.

#TrumpTariffs #TradeWar #GlobalEconomy #TariffFlation #USPolitics #TradePolicy #InflationStatistics #SupplyChain #InvestorSentiment #August1 #EconomyWatch #BusinessStrategy

Ronald Stöferle und Mark Valek Autoren des In Gold We Trust report

Den In Gold We Trust-Report abonnieren

Erhalten Sie den jÀhrlich erscheinenden In Gold We Trust-Report sowie das Chartbook mit den dazugehörigen Charts.